Home»Agencies

Best Agencies

The 8 Best Directive Alternatives for B2B SaaS in Q4 2026

Justin Berg
Founder of Rock The Rankings
​
Published
November 8, 2026
Last Updated
November 8, 2026
Top ratedOur pick · #1

Rock The Rankings

8.9
/ 10 · editorial score
​

TL;DR: Key Takeaway

verdict

Rock The Rankings is the Directive alternative for B2B SaaS teams between $2M and $50M ARR that want a SaaS-only AI search and SEO specialist with Founder, Justin Berg, on the account and published tiers from $5,050 a month, instead of a 130-person multi-division agency bought through a proposal. Virayo ranks highest among the alternatives for teams that want AI citation data on a platform they can keep; MADX Digital is the pick if digital PR from a SaaS-only team with every tier listed matters more. Directive remains the right choice for a mid-market or enterprise B2B company that wants paid media, SEO, creative, RevOps, and communications coordinated by one large agency across several industries.

Scroll to see all agencies

1-4 of 15‹›
Our pick
1
Rock The Rankings
Rock The Rankings
USA

Price starts at

From $5,050/mo · published tiers

Best for

Growth-stage SaaS wanting a search-only specialist, founder-led.
Read the overviewRead the overview
8.9
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • AI search optimization
  • SaaS SEO
  • Solution-aware page production
  • Citation building and digital PR
  • Technical SEO
  • AI search attribution and forecasting
Pros​
  • One customer type and one discipline: B2B SaaS, AI search and SEO, across 300+ engagements
  • Founder, Justin Berg, and senior operators run every account from first call to monthly report
  • Published tiers from $5,050 a month with a month-to-month option, and a three-scenario demo forecast written before the agreement
Cons​
  • Search only, so paid media, creative, RevOps, PR, and social all sit outside what we do.
  • A verified record of 14 Clutch reviews next to Directive's 56.
Our pick
1
Virayo
Virayo
Boise, USA

Price starts at

From $7,500/mo

Best for

Series A+ SaaS wanting citation data from an owned platform.
Read the overviewRead the overview
7.7
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • AI search visibility and brand monitoring
  • SEO strategy scoped to demo targets
  • LLM source gap analysis
  • Content production
  • Link building and digital PR
  • Technical and content audits
Pros​
  • The Virayo AI platform tracks how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini cite a client and can feed that data into Claude through MCP
  • Every program is scoped against trials, demos, and revenue
  • Takes on B2B SaaS companies past product-market fit and no one else
Cons​
  • $7,500 a month on a six-month initial term, so neither the cheapest nor the most flexible option here.
  • A Clutch record of 11 reviews against Directive's 56.
Our pick
1
SimpleTiger
SimpleTiger
Sarasota, USA

Price starts at

From $4,000/mo

Best for

SaaS teams keeping paid and SEO together, month to month.
Read the overviewRead the overview
7.6
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • SaaS SEO
  • AI search optimization and citation outreach
  • Content strategy and production
  • Paid search and paid social
  • Webflow design and development
Pros​
  • Paid search, paid social, SEO, and AI search from one SaaS-only team, the closest service match to Directive's Performance division on this page
  • Starts at $4,000 a month on month-to-month terms
  • 34 Clutch reviews at 4.9, the deepest record among the SaaS specialists here
Cons​
  • The agency's FAQ describes typical mid-market retainers near $8,000, so $4,000 is where pricing starts rather than where most programs land.
  • No RevOps, programmatic, or performance creative, all of which Directive sells.
  • Its case studies are measured in rankings and traffic, not pipeline.
Our pick
1
MADX Digital
MADX Digital
London, UK

Price starts at

From $5,500/mo · published tiers

Best for

SaaS teams wanting AI search, SEO, and PR priced per tier.
Read the overviewRead the overview
7.6
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • AI search optimization
  • SaaS SEO strategy
  • Digital PR and link building
  • Content writing
  • Technical SEO
Pros​
  • Every tier is published, from $5,500 to $14,500, where Directive quotes by proposal
  • Digital PR is done in house, so the third-party coverage AI assistants quote comes from the same team
  • SaaS and tech only, with 14 Clutch reviews at 4.9
Cons​
  • The $5,500 tier includes no articles; a program with content starts at $9,500 a month.
  • Case studies are written in rankings and traffic rather than pipeline.
Our pick
1
Skale
Skale
London, UK

Price starts at

From $5,000/project

Best for

SaaS and fintech wanting organic reported in signups and MRR.
Read the overviewRead the overview
7.5
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • AI search and SEO consultancy
  • AI brand mentions
  • Link building
  • Content production
  • Website migrations
Pros​
  • Calls itself AI-search-first and reports in SQLs, signups, and MRR
  • Rated 4.9 by 21 Clutch reviewers, who most often mention timeliness and communication
  • Native speakers run its English, Spanish, and German market programs
Cons​
  • Organic only, so paid media needs a second partner.
  • Each account is run by a two-to-five-person team in set roles rather than by a founder.
Our pick
1
Omniscient Digital
Omniscient Digital
Austin, USA

Price starts at

From $10,000/mo

Best for

Funded mid-market SaaS wanting a strategy-first annual program.
Read the overviewRead the overview
7.3
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • Content strategy and production
  • Answer engine optimization
  • Digital PR
  • Technical SEO
  • Programmatic SEO
Pros​
  • Case studies in pipeline and ARR, including $4M+ attributable ARR for Jasper
  • Has published original research covering more than 23,000 AI citations
  • Its founders ran growth in house at HubSpot, Shopify, People.ai, and Workato before starting the agency
Cons​
  • Full-service engagements start at $120,000 a year, the longest commitment on this page.
  • Four Clutch reviews, where Directive has 56.
Our pick
1
Siege Media
Siege Media
Austin, USA · San Diego, USA · New York, USA

Price starts at

From $5,000/project

Best for

Enterprise brands wanting high-volume content, PR, and design.
Read the overviewRead the overview
7.1
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • Content strategy and production
  • Generative engine optimization
  • Digital PR and research reports
  • Affiliate partnerships
  • Reddit marketing
  • Web and graphic design
Pros​
  • 48 Clutch reviews at 4.9, second only to Directive's record among the agencies here
  • An in-house design team that, by Siege's own account, takes up nearly half of content production time
  • GEO results published on named SaaS accounts, Zendesk at 98% LLM visibility among them, with a founder who literally wrote the book on it for Wiley
Cons​
  • The results it publishes are traffic value, linking root domains, and LLM visibility share.
  • Half its Clutch clients are enterprise and the typical engagement runs $50,000 to $199,999.
  • Eight industries, no paid media.
Our pick
1
Powered by Search
Powered by Search
Toronto, Canada

Price starts at

From $9,000/mo · published tiers

Best for

B2B teams wanting paid, organic, and RevOps from senior pods.
Read the overviewRead the overview
6.9
/10 editorial score
​
Key services​
  • Paid media management
  • SEO and LLM visibility
  • Digital PR and link building
  • Account-based marketing
  • HubSpot RevOps
Pros​
  • Every tier is published, including pilots at $2,500 and $14,900, where Directive quotes by proposal
  • Senior-only pods led by a strategic lead with 15 or more years of experience, and no project-manager layer
  • A published 30% pipeline guarantee over 90 days, with results reported in sales-qualified opportunities and ARR
Cons​
  • No verified Clutch reviews, so the public proof is the agency's own case studies.
  • B2B broadly, from cybersecurity to industrial software, rather than SaaS only.
  • The organic entry tier is $9,000 a month, the highest monthly starting point on this page.

How we scored

The criteria, weighted for pipeline.

We reviewed public case studies, client rosters, pricing pages, and third-party reviews. One question outranks the rest: does the agency connect search activity to pipeline you can audit, or does it report traffic and hope you are impressed.

25
%
Pipeline accountability
Reports demos, trials, or revenue from organic, or reports traffic value and rankings
​
20
%
AI search practice
A tested citation practice with client results, or AI search as a line on an SEO plan
​
15
%
Verified reviews
Rating and depth on Clutch, or a thin or absent third-party record
​
10
%
B2B SaaS focus
SaaS is the business, or SaaS is one vertical among many
​
10
%
Pricing and terms
Published entry price with flexible terms, or custom quotes and long minimums
​
10
%
Senior access
Founders or senior strategists on the account day to day, or a layered team
​
10
%
Fit for this comparison
Answers the preferences named in the takeaways directly, or answers them only in part
​
100
%
Total editorial score
Weights fixed before scoring. Re-scored every quarter.

The breakdown

Every agency; the full breakdown:

Read the criteria, check the results, and judge for yourself. Every other entry gets the same fields and an honest tradeoff line.

1
Rock The Rankings

Rock The Rankings

USA
8.9
​
Best for:
Best for B2B SaaS teams between $2M and $50M ARR that want AI search and SEO run as one program by a SaaS-only specialist, with the founder on the account, tiers published from $5,050 a month, and a demo forecast written before the agreement.
Pricing
From $5,050 per month, Strategy and Consulting tier
Founded
2019
Team Size
Compact senior team, founder-led
Third-party ratings
5.0/5.0 Rating, 14 Reviews
Contract minimum
Month to month, 90-day, or 12-month
Location
USA
Key clients
Lendbuzz · Rasa · WaitWell
Service model
SEO & AI search

Rock The Rankings is a US agency that treats AI search and Google as one program for growth-stage B2B SaaS companies, measured in demos. A team comparing Directive alternatives is usually asking a scale question: whether it wants a large agency that can staff every channel, or a small specialist that does one thing for one kind of company.

We are the specialist. Founder, Justin Berg, who has worked in SEO since 2007, runs every engagement with senior operators, the tiers are on the pricing page, and before anything is signed we put three demo scenarios in writing and grade the program against them each month.

How we're different from Directive

Directive has built something we have not: a 130-person agency with three divisions and 56 verified reviews. The four differences below are about focus, size, and how the engagement is bought, taken from Directive's own site and Clutch profile and from ours.

1. SaaS only, search only

Directive lists ten industries from technology to wholesale and three divisions covering paid media, commerce, and communications. That range is what lets it serve Dropbox and AWS alongside industrial manufacturers. We work only with B2B SaaS companies and only on AI search and SEO, so the category pages, comparison queries, and buying prompts we build against are the ones SaaS buyers use.

2. A founder-run account instead of a team sized for enterprise

Directive's 130-plus people and six offices give it the capacity to run multi-channel programs for large companies. Our model is the opposite size: Founder, Justin Berg, runs every engagement day to day with senior operators, and there is no account layer between you and the person who wrote the strategy.

3. Published tiers instead of a proposal

Directive prices by quote and publishes an RFP template for buyers to use, which fits the enterprise procurement it is built for. Our tiers are on the pricing page from $5,050 a month, with a month-to-month option, so a growth-stage team can price the program before the first call.

4. A demo forecast before the agreement, graded monthly

Directive measures Performance-division work against pipeline under its DiscoverabilityOS methodology and runs public sessions on attribution. What we add is timing and specificity: Conservative, Realistic, and Optimistic demo scenarios on your funnel before the agreement, then a monthly report that opens by grading the program against them, with attribution read on two signals.

5. The three AI search problems we are hired to fix

B2B SaaS teams that already measure organic in pipeline usually come to us with one of three requests. Here is how each one works inside our engagements.

Problem 01

"The board wants a number for AI search before we spend."

The cause: a proposal describes what an agency will do. A board wants to know what the program should produce on this company's funnel, in scenarios, before the budget is committed.

What we ship: a three-scenario demo forecast on your funnel, written before the agreement is signed, then monthly grading against it. WaitWell cleared its four-month Realistic case early.

WaitWell · cumulative demos vs the forecast published before kickoffReceipt
​Realistic forecast · 1.0×
​0.9×Month 1
​1.5×Month 2
​2.4×Month 3
​2.9×Month 4

Month 4 closed at 2.9× Realistic and 7.9× Conservative, with both scenarios published before a single page shipped.

Problem 02

"We want a senior operator on the account, not someone in their first year, and terms we can see before the first call."

The cause: at a hundred-plus people, an agency has to staff accounts from a bench, and the most experienced people are spread across the largest programs.

What we ship: Founder, Justin Berg, who has worked in SEO since 2007, runs the engagement with senior operators who have each shipped B2B SaaS programs before yours. The tiers are on the pricing page before anyone books a call, and nobody hands you off after the sale.

How an engagement runs · first 90 daysArtifact
DeliverableOwnerWeightWindow
Three-scenario demo forecastFounder, Justin BergHighBefore signature
Citation baseline across five enginesFounder, Justin BergHighWeek 1
First solution-aware pages and placementsSenior operatorsHighWk 2 to 8
Monthly report graded against the forecastFounder, Justin BergHighMonth 1 onward

Every row has a named owner, and the forecast row is the one we are graded against.

Problem 03

"We need AI search and SEO tracked against pipeline, not against traffic."

The cause: AI assistants strip the referrer, so buyers who researched you in ChatGPT or Perplexity are filed as Direct, and a pipeline model that trusts the click record alone undercounts the channel it is meant to measure.

What we ship: a citation baseline across five engines re-run monthly, solution-aware pages built against the buying prompts, and two-signal attribution that reads the click record and the buyer's own answer, so the share of demos from AI search and SEO is a number the CRM supports.

One SaaS client · AI search share of all demosReceipt
​0%Before
​10%Month 1
​22%Month 3
​40%Month 6

Measured on two signals, so the share counts demos both the click record and the buyer's own answer support.

Services

  • AI search optimization
  • SaaS SEO
  • Solution-aware page production
  • Citation building and digital PR
  • Technical SEO
  • AI search attribution and forecasting

Published proof

Lendbuzz: named in 21 of 23 tracked AI answer themes, 2.3× ahead of its nearest competitor, with core conversion events up 200% and 276% year over year. Rasa: attributed demo requests up 2.3× in one quarter, and 12.5× more demand than the analytics classifier credited. WaitWell: demos at 2.9× the Realistic forecast and 7.9× the Conservative case in four months. Keragon: DR 0 to 68 and 220× monthly organic sessions with no links bought.

Further reading

Pricing

Engagements start at $5,050 per month for Strategy and Consulting, with a month-to-month option. AI search is included in every tier. Full detail is on the pricing page.

TradeoffOur scope is AI search and SEO for B2B SaaS, full stop. If you want paid media, performance creative, RevOps, and communications from one agency, Directive's three divisions cover ground we do not.

When to pick someone else on this list

Not every team reading this should hire us, and a wrong fit costs both sides a quarter. Route yourself by what you want:

  • Search and PR from a SaaS-only shop that lists every tier on its site → MADX Digital (#4).
  • Citation data from a platform the agency owns, with a six-month term acceptable → Virayo (#2).
  • Paid media and SEO kept together on a SaaS-only, month-to-month retainer → SimpleTiger (#3).
  • Organic reported in signups and MRR, with Spanish and German coverage → Skale (#5).
  • A strategy-first organic program for a funded mid-market company, on an annual engagement → Omniscient Digital (#6).
  • High-volume content, digital PR, and design for an enterprise brand → Siege Media (#7).
  • Paid, organic, and RevOps from senior pods with every tier published → Powered by Search (#8).
  • Paid media, SEO, creative, RevOps, and communications coordinated by one large agency across several industries → stay with Directive.

If you are a B2B SaaS company between $2M and $50M ARR and the brief is AI search and SEO measured in demos, book the call. Whatever you decide, you leave with a citation baseline and a forecast on your own funnel.

Mini case studies

WaitWell: demos at 2.9× forecast in four months

WaitWell sells queue management and appointment scheduling software. Its CRM credited 42% of demo bookers to Direct, so a channel already producing customers looked thin on the dashboard.

We published Conservative, Realistic, and Optimistic demo scenarios before kickoff, built best-of and alternatives pages for the shortlist queries, and resolved every contact on two signals.

2.9×Demos vs Realistic forecast
7.9×Demos vs Conservative forecast
42%Demo bookers once filed as Direct
Read the full WaitWell story ↗

Lendbuzz: 21 of 23 AI answer themes

Lendbuzz underwrites car loans on income, education, and employment data rather than a US credit score alone. Its buyers describe a circumstance to an AI assistant rather than naming a lender.

We built a content cluster around those circumstances and measured only what the program owns: key events segmented to organic, on pages we built.

21/23AI answer themes present
2.3×Ahead of nearest competitor
+276%Second core conversion event, YoY
Read the full Lendbuzz story ↗

Rasa: demand the classifier could not see

Rasa builds the conversational AI platform enterprise teams use to deploy and govern their own assistants. The demand AI engines produced arrived without a referrer, so the CRM could not see it.

We shipped solution-aware pages written to be quoted as well as ranked, and read every contact on two signals so the channel could be funded.

2.3×Attributed demo requests, QoQ
12.5×More demand than the classifier saw
9.0×Sessions to shortlist pages
Read the full Rasa story ↗

Comparing Directive alternatives? Start with a forecast, not a proposal.

Forty-five minutes with our founder, and you leave with a citation baseline, a prompt map, and three demo scenarios built on your funnel.

✓SaaS only✓Founder-led✓Forecast before kickoff
Tradeoff
Our scope is AI search and SEO for B2B SaaS, full stop. If you want paid media, performance creative, RevOps, and communications from one agency, Directive's three divisions cover ground we do not.
Learn more about this agency →
1
Virayo

Virayo

Boise, USA
7.7
​
Best for:
Best for Series A and later B2B SaaS teams that want AI search visibility built across review sites, listicles, and communities and tracked prompt by prompt on software the agency built itself.
Pricing
From $7,500 per month on a 6-month initial term
Founded
2018
Team Size
10 to 49
Third-party ratings
4.8/5.0 Rating, 11 Reviews
Contract minimum
6-month initial term
Location
Boise, USA
Key clients
Truckstop · Sprout Social · TestRail
Service model
SEO & AI search

Virayo works from Boise with B2B SaaS companies past product-market fit, scoping each program to trials, demos, and revenue targets. Its Integrated Discovery Framework works a priority topic across organic results, AI Overviews, review sites, listicles, communities, and LLMs at the same time.

Where Directive sells technology as part of a broad platform, Virayo's platform does one job: tracking citations engine by engine and handing the data to the client. It is the pick when owning that data matters more than breadth or flexibility.

Tradeoff
The entry price and six-month initial term buy proprietary tooling, not flexibility, and the review record is a fraction of Directive's.
Learn more about this agency →
1
SimpleTiger

SimpleTiger

Sarasota, USA
7.6
​
Best for:
Best for SaaS teams that want to keep paid media and SEO under one roof, as Directive offers, but from a SaaS-only agency of 10 to 49 people on month-to-month terms.
Pricing
From $4,000 per month; average retainers near $8,000
Founded
2006
Team Size
10 to 49
Third-party ratings
4.9/5.0 Rating, 34 Reviews
Contract minimum
Month-to-month
Location
Sarasota, USA
Key clients
Segment · Gainsight · JotForm
Service model
SEO & PPC

SimpleTiger has worked only with SaaS companies since 2006 from Sarasota, Florida, pairing SEO and AI search with paid search, paid social, and Webflow builds. Segment, Gainsight, and JotForm have been clients, and one of its Clutch case studies credits AI and organic search with more than $3 million in revenue inside ten months.

For a team that likes having paid and organic in one place but wants a SaaS-only shop a tenth the size of Directive, with no contract term, it is the natural first call. What it does not have is Directive's creative, programmatic, and RevOps bench.

Tradeoff
The closest service match at the most flexible terms, without Directive's creative, programmatic, and RevOps capability, and with proof written in traffic and rankings.
Learn more about this agency →
1
MADX Digital

MADX Digital

London, UK
7.6
​
Best for:
Best for B2B SaaS teams that want the search and PR parts of Directive's Performance division from a SaaS-only agency with every monthly tier on its site and a three-month rolling term.
Pricing
Published tiers $5,500 to $14,500 per month
Founded
2021
Team Size
10 to 49
Third-party ratings
4.9/5.0 Rating, 14 Reviews
Contract minimum
3-month minimum (rolling)
Location
London, UK
Key clients
VEED · Postalytics · Orderful
Service model
SEO & AI search

MADX Digital is a London SaaS and tech specialist founded in 2021 by Perry Steward and Toni Koraza. It sells AI search, SEO, and digital PR from monthly tiers listed on its site, and its 14 Clutch reviewers rate it 4.9. VEED, Postalytics, and Orderful are among its clients.

It is the smallest step away from Directive for a team that wants search and PR but not the rest of the Performance division, and it answers the price-list preference directly. The thing to check is the reporting unit: MADX publishes rankings and traffic where Directive publishes pipeline.

Tradeoff
The real comparison point is the $9,500 tier that includes content, and the published results are rankings and traffic rather than pipeline.
Learn more about this agency →
1
Skale

Skale

London, UK
7.5
​
Best for:
Best for B2B SaaS and fintech companies that want AI search and SEO alone, reported in SQLs, signups, and MRR, from a SaaS-only team with native coverage for Spanish and German markets.
Pricing
From $4,000 per month on its site; $5,000 Clutch minimum
Founded
2019
Team Size
10 to 49
Third-party ratings
4.9/5.0 Rating, 21 Reviews
Contract minimum
Clutch minimum $5,000+
Location
London, UK
Key clients
HubSpot · TravelPerk · Typeform
Service model
SEO & AI search

Skale was founded in London in 2019 by Jake Stainer, formerly of Typeform and TravelPerk, and Italo Viale, and runs GEO and SEO as one system measured in SQLs, signups, and MRR. Its Clutch record is 4.9 across 21 reviews.

Against Directive it is the SaaS-only, organic-only specialist with a starting price of $4,000 a month on its site, plus native Spanish and German coverage that few on this page can match. Accounts are run by a small role-based team, not a founder.

Tradeoff
Organic only, from a role-based team of two to five per account, so neither the paid lever nor a founder-run model is on offer.
Learn more about this agency →
1
Omniscient Digital

Omniscient Digital

Austin, USA
7.3
​
Best for:
Best for funded mid-market B2B SaaS teams that want an organic program led by strategy and reported in pipeline and ARR, from a team that publishes its own AI citation research, on an annual engagement.
Pricing
Full-service engagements from $120,000 per year
Founded
2019
Team Size
10 to 49
Third-party ratings
4.8/5.0 Rating, 4 Reviews
Contract minimum
Annual full-service engagements from $120,000
Location
Austin, USA
Key clients
SAP · Jasper · AppSumo
Service model
SEO & AI search

Omniscient Digital was started in Austin in 2019 by marketers from HubSpot, Shopify, People.ai, and Workato, and reports organic in pipeline and ARR. Its published research on how models select sources is the most detailed AI search evidence any agency on this page has made public.

It suits a funded mid-market SaaS company that wants a strategy-led organic program and has an annual budget approved. It does not run paid media, and its verified review record is the shortest on the page.

Tradeoff
An annual engagement from $120,000 on a four-review Clutch record, so more commitment with less verified evidence than most of this page.
Learn more about this agency →
1
Siege Media

Siege Media

Austin, USA · San Diego, USA · New York, USA
7.1
​
Best for:
Best for enterprise brands across SaaS, fintech, ecommerce, and other verticals that want content, digital PR, affiliate, and design produced at volume by an agency of Directive's scale, with 48 Clutch reviews behind it.
Pricing
Custom pricing; most common project $50,000 to $199,999
Founded
2012
Team Size
50 to 249
Third-party ratings
4.9/5.0 Rating, 48 Reviews
Contract minimum
Clutch minimum $5,000+; custom terms
Location
Austin, USA · San Diego, USA · New York, USA
Key clients
Zendesk · Zapier · Asana
Service model
SEO & AI search

Ross Hudgens founded Siege Media in 2012; it is now an Austin-headquartered agency of 50 to 249 people with five US offices. Today it describes itself as a full-service GEO agency, and its output for Zendesk, Zapier, Asana, Intuit, and Chime spans content, digital PR, affiliate, Reddit, and design.

It is the one agency on this page comparable to Directive in size and review depth, and it is the pick when content production and design at volume is the brief. It does not run paid media, and its reporting unit is traffic value rather than pipeline.

Tradeoff
A large, enterprise-weighted, multi-industry content agency whose published results lead with traffic value; like Directive, it is built for six-figure programs.
Learn more about this agency →
1
Powered by Search

Powered by Search

Toronto, Canada
6.9
​
Best for:
Best for B2B companies spending $15,000 or more a month on growth that want paid media, SEO and LLM visibility, and RevOps run as one program by senior pods, with every tier published and a 30% pipeline guarantee.
Pricing
SEO and LLM consulting from $9,000/mo; paid media from $6,000/mo
Founded
2009
Team Size
About 40
Third-party ratings
No verified Clutch reviews
Contract minimum
Monthly or quarterly plans
Location
Toronto, Canada
Key clients
SentinelOne · Varonis · Basecamp
Service model
Full-service

Powered by Search is a Toronto B2B demand generation agency founded in 2009 by Dev Basu. It sells paid media, SEO and LLM visibility, and RevOps as three levers with published tiers, runs them through senior-only pods, and publishes a 30% pipeline guarantee over 90 days. SentinelOne, Varonis, Basecamp, Fortra, and Elastic are among its clients.

It is the closest alternative to Directive in service mix and the most transparent on price, with a team about a third of Directive's size. Its own fit criteria name B2B companies spending $15,000 or more a month on growth, and it has no verified Clutch reviews to set against Directive's 56.

Tradeoff
The most transparent pricing on this page and a senior pod model, but no verified third-party review record and an organic entry price of $9,000 a month.
Learn more about this agency →

How to choose

Six questions to ask before you sign.

1

Is the agency built for your size of company?

A 130-person, three-division agency and a founder-run specialist are both legitimate, and they are built for different clients. Ask what the typical engagement looks like and whether a company your size is the norm or the exception on the roster.
1

How many industries does it serve, and how many does it name?

Directive lists ten. Some on this page list one. Ask how much of the current client base is B2B SaaS and for a named case in your category, because the buying prompts and comparison pages differ by industry.
1

Is pricing published or proposed?

A proposal or RFP process suits procurement-led buying. A published tier list suits a growth-stage team that wants to know the number before the call. Decide which you are before you book.
1

Who runs the account day to day?

Ask who writes the strategy, who is on the weekly call, and who signs the monthly report. Then check those names against the agency's reviews. The answer ranges from the founder to a rotating pod, and the price often tells you which.
1

When is the forecast written, and what is it graded against?

A methodology tells you how an agency thinks. Scenarios on your own funnel, written before the agreement and reported against every month, tell you what it expects to deliver. Ask whether you can see one from a live client.
1

What does the verified record show, and how old is it?

Fifty-six Clutch reviews is a serious record; so is fourteen for an agency a fraction of the size. Weigh the count against the agency's age and size, read the "areas for improvement" answers, and ask for a reference in your category.

FAQs

Common questions about hiring an agency

If yours is not here, bring it to the call. Same unpolished answer either way.

1

Why do B2B SaaS teams look for Directive alternatives?

+

Usually because of size and scope rather than quality. Directive has 130-plus people, three divisions, and ten industries, which suits a mid-market or enterprise company that wants several channels coordinated by one agency. A growth-stage SaaS team may prefer a SaaS-only specialist, search as a standalone program, the founder on the account, or published tiers instead of a proposal.

1

Is Directive good for B2B SaaS?

+

Yes. Technology is its first listed vertical, its clients include Dropbox, AWS, and Gong, and its Clutch record is 4.8 across 56 reviews with project management the most consistent praise. It is built for mid-market and enterprise programs, so a $2M to $50M ARR company should ask whether it would be a typical account.

1

How much does Directive cost compared to the alternatives?

+

Directive prices by quote and publishes an RFP template; Clutch lists $100 to $149 an hour with $10,000 to $49,999 the most common engagement. On this page, SimpleTiger and Skale start at $4,000 a month, Rock The Rankings at $5,050, MADX Digital at $5,500, Virayo at $7,500, Powered by Search at $9,000 for organic, Omniscient at $120,000 a year, and Siege Media quotes per client.

1

Which Directive alternative also runs paid media?

+

SimpleTiger and Powered by Search run paid media alongside SEO. The other six on this page, Rock The Rankings, MADX Digital, Virayo, Skale, Omniscient Digital, and Siege Media, do organic only.

1

Does Directive do AI search?

+

Yes. Its DiscoverabilityOS methodology is framed around visibility where buyers research and shortlist, and its Performance division includes SEO and content built around how modern buyers search. The differences on this page are about size, industry focus, pricing model, and who is on the account, not about whether AI search is part of the work.

1

How is this list scored, and did you rank yourself first?

+

We did. Rock The Rankings publishes this list and ranks itself, and every agency on the board is scored on the same seven weighted criteria shown above, with pipeline accountability carrying the most weight. Directive itself is profiled but not scored, and the routing section under our entry sends you to a competitor, or back to Directive, when that is the better fit.

Next step

Your GEO plan, built on your numbers.

Give us your domain and your pipeline goal. We map the prompts your buyers are asking, build your GEO marketing plan against them, and forecast the pipeline the next 90 days can realistically produce.

Your plan · Walked through live
​Founder-built
Justin Berg
Founder · Rock the Rankings

What we walk through

01Your prompt map: the buying prompts and queries that land you on a vendor shortlist.
02Where you show up today vs. your three closest competitors and where the gaps exist.
03The 90-day sequence: what we would ship, in what order.
04The 3-scenario ROI forecast, run on your actual numbers.
No SDRs · ONLY SENIOR OPERATORS · 300+ B2B SAAS ENGAGEMENTS