Choose Breaking B2B if you want a 6- or 12-month programme with 7 to 20 content pieces and 4 to 14 DA50+ link credits a month, CRO heatmaps and a live dashboard, and a minimum term does not bother you. Choose Rock the Rankings if your board wants a pipeline number someone will be held to, you want a monthly plan with no minimum term, your CRM files AI-sourced demos as Direct, and you want the founder on the account from the first call.
At a glance
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | drawSenior-led SEO, GEO and AEO for B2B and SaaS. UK, founded by Sam Dunning. | drawAI search as a pipeline channel. B2B SaaS and tech only. 300+ engagements. |
| Forecast and commitment | loseCustom 90-day plan before you commit. Scenarios: Not public. No promise. | winThree scenarios before signing. The conservative scenario is the commitment. |
| Attribution method | drawLive Looker Studio dashboard to conversion events and pipeline. Method: Not public. | drawThe Two-Witness Rule: CRM source and buyer's answer, every contact tiered. |
| AI search baseline | drawAnswer-gap audit first. AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini. | drawBaseline across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews. |
| Channel breadth and extras | winCRO heatmaps from Gold; Reddit and YouTube marketing; website support add-on. | loseSEO, AI search, content, links, technical. No CRO programs, Reddit or video. |
| Who runs the account | loseDedicated lead strategist and senior SEOs; bi-weekly calls. Sam on the first call. | winFounder, Justin Berg and a senior strategist. No account managers. |
| Pricing transparency | loseSix tiers published. Six- or twelve-month terms only; nothing shorter. | winPrices published. Monthly plan, no minimum, 30 days' notice. |
| Link and citation building | win4 to 14 link credits a month, DA50+, manual outreach. 2 credits = 1 listicle mention. | loseFrom 5 to 8 placements a month at DR 50+, scaled to the forecast. |
| Content production | draw7 to 20 pieces a month, 1 to 3k words, bottom and mid funnel first. | drawFrom 5 solution-aware pages a month, scaling to 20 or 30+ with the forecast. |
| Best fit | drawB2B SaaS and service companies wanting a fixed-capacity programme over 6 or 12 months. | drawB2B SaaS and tech wanting a pipeline number before spending, on a monthly plan. |
Comparison methodology
Scored on what Breaking B2B publishes on its own site, checked 14 November 2026. Nothing from sales calls or third parties.
We read Breaking B2B's home, pricing and answer engine optimization pages, and scored only what those pages say. Rock the Rankings is scored on its published pricing, process and client results pages. Where Breaking B2B publishes nothing on a criterion, the cell says Not public.
Win, draw and lose describe the Rock the Rankings column only. Win means we commit to more, or offer the criterion on every plan where Breaking B2B offers it on some. Lose means Breaking B2B publishes or ships more. Draw means both agencies meet the criterion in different ways and the right choice depends on your situation.
We re-score every quarter and whenever either agency changes its published pricing or plan inclusions.
Researched, written and reviewed by


Both agencies publish full prices and plan inclusions. The difference is the minimum term.
Breaking B2B publishes six tiers, each priced on a 12-month term with a 6-month option $500 a month higher: Silver $6,000 (7 content pieces, 4 link credits), Gold $8,000 (10 and 6), Growth Team $9,000 (12 and 7), Diamond $10,200 (14 and 8), Aggressive Growth $15,200 (20 and 14) and Category King from $20,000, plus a narrower Light plan from $4,600 on a 12-month term.
Its FAQ says it does not run retainers shorter than six months because a three-month engagement ends before the work pays.
Rock the Rankings is $5,000 for Consulting, $8,500 for Done-For-You and $15,000 for Authority a month, with no onboarding fee, on a monthly plan with no minimum term and 30 days' notice. Day 90 is the first forecast review, measured against the conservative scenario you received before signing.
The honest comparison: Breaking B2B is the better pick if you want more capacity per dollar and have already decided on a programme length. Gold at $8,000 a month on a 12-month term buys 10 content pieces, 6 DA50+ link credits, CRO heatmaps and a live dashboard, and the tier ladder makes it easy to buy exactly the output you want.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you do not want to choose between a six-month and a twelve-month rate to get the price. Ours is one number a month, cancellable with 30 days' notice; the tradeoff is that we start focused and scale as the forecast proves out.
"Justin and his team have been phenomenal from Day 0, and the consistency in quality and the measurable results they have delivered have been a true transformation to our business. We are extremely happy and we have already recommended them to our friends."

Both agencies put a plan in front of you before you commit. The difference is whether the plan has a number attached and whether anyone is held to it.
Breaking B2B's process is a 30-minute call with Sam Dunning, then a custom 90-day plan you see before you commit, then kick-off in week one. Its pricing FAQ is specific about timing: if your site already has SEO equity, quick wins typically produce demos and leads within 90 days; if it is building net-new content, pipeline realistically starts from month four. It publishes no scenario forecast and makes no results promise.
Rock the Rankings builds three scenarios (conservative, realistic, optimistic) from your GA4 and CRM data before any agreement is signed, with capture rate as the only input that changes between them. The conservative scenario is the commitment, reviewed at day 90 and quarterly after.
The honest comparison: Breaking B2B is the better pick if you want a plan rather than a projection, and you value a plain statement about timing. Its "90 days if you have equity, month four if you do not" framing is specific and credible, and the monthly roadmap is rebuilt from what performed the month before.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if a fixed-capacity tier is not the commitment you want and a pipeline number is. The conservative scenario is what we are held to at day 90 and quarterly after, and it is only as good as the data you share.
Both run Google and AI search as one programme and both start with bottom-funnel pages. The differences are in how AI search scales by tier.
Breaking B2B runs AEO and GEO together on top of SEO, starting with an answer-gap audit of who is cited today in your category, then question-led pages, FAQ and entity schema, author and E-E-A-T signals, and brand-mention outreach to the third-party sources engines pull from, across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini.
Its pricing table grades AI search by tier: "Included" on Silver, "Enhanced" on Gold and Growth Team, "Aggressive" on Diamond and Aggressive Growth, with tracked buyer prompt sets monitored monthly at the higher tiers. Its Chattermill case reports an AI mention rate rising from 20 to 80 percent.
Rock the Rankings baselines across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode and AI Overviews before work ships, then builds in the GEO Stack order: solution-aware pages first, citations second, problem-aware capture last, with the same engine coverage and prompt tracking on every plan.
The honest comparison: Breaking B2B is the better pick if you want AI search run with more outreach behind it from day one. Its higher tiers put 8 to 14 DA50+ credits a month into the listicles and review sites engines quote, and run displacement campaigns on prompts where a rival is currently the named answer.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you want the AI search baseline measured before anything ships and held to a forecast, rather than delivered inside a channel bundle. We run fewer surfaces, no Reddit or YouTube, and scale them as the forecast proves out.
"I have been impressed with Justin and team's knowledge, work ethic and commitment to improving SEO. I have been in the digital space for nearly 20 years across different verticals and Rock the Rankings is the only SEO agency that I have worked with that has made a meaningful impact to the associated business. If I found myself at another company, needing help with SEO, Justin would be my first call"
AI assistants strip referrers, so most AI-sourced demos land in your CRM as Direct.
Breaking B2B builds every client a custom Looker Studio dashboard that connects search performance through to conversion events and pipeline, live, so you are not waiting on a monthly report; it asks for CRM access at onboarding and ties AEO tracking to demos and qualified pipeline. How it reconciles AI-sourced demos that arrive without a referrer is not published.
Rock the Rankings applies The Two-Witness Rule on every plan: the CRM source and the buyer's own answer are read together and every contact is tiered confirmed, recovered, probable or dark. On one client funnel, 11 CRM-attributed AI leads sat beside 809 self-reported ones, a 73× gap. Where CRM access is restricted, we work from an anonymised export under NDA.
The honest comparison: Breaking B2B is the better pick if you want the numbers live. A Looker Studio dashboard wired to conversion events on every tier, with leadership views built on request, answers the board-meeting question without waiting for a report.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if a Looker dashboard is not the question and the question is why AI-sourced demos arrive as Direct. We reconcile every contact against the buyer's own answer, monthly, by hand.
This is where Breaking B2B covers more ground than we do.
Beyond SEO, content and links, Breaking B2B includes CRO heatmaps on Gold and above, runs continuous technical SEO with a website support add-on for teams without developers, and sells Reddit marketing and YouTube marketing as named services. Every tier includes competitor displacement work, scaling from gap analysis on Silver to takeover campaigns on Category King.
Rock the Rankings runs SEO, AI search, content, links and technical only; we do not run CRO testing programmes, Reddit, video or paid, and we do not build or support websites.
The honest comparison: Breaking B2B is the better pick if you want one agency to also fix conversion leaks and run community and video channels. Heatmaps on your commercial pages, a dev add-on, and Reddit or YouTube programmes under the same roof remove seams a small marketing team feels.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if organic and AI search are the channels you are buying and CRO, Reddit and video are not. We start focused and scale as the forecast proves out; those extras will need a second partner.
"Extremely responsive and analytical. We were impressed with the depth of knowledge brought to every meeting. Justin was great to work with. I highly recommend Rock the Rankings for your GEO/SEO needs."

Both agencies say the same thing about juniors. The structures differ in where the founder sits.
Breaking B2B's first call is with founder Sam Dunning, after which a dedicated lead strategist owns the programme end to end, supported by senior SEOs, writers and a digital PR team, with bi-weekly calls, a shared Slack channel, weekly proactive recommendations and named senior account leadership on every tier; its pricing page says no junior account managers and no offshore content mill.
Rock the Rankings is founder-led through delivery: Founder, Justin Berg runs strategy on every engagement alongside a senior strategist with B2B SaaS category experience, with no account managers in between, Slack and email with same-day replies, and a quarterly review that opens with the pipeline number.
The honest comparison: Breaking B2B is the better pick if you want a named lead strategist with a bench behind them and a fixed call rhythm. Bi-weekly calls, weekly recommendations and senior account leadership on every tier is a well-defined structure, and the founder's podcast and content give you a clear read on the thinking before you call.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you want the strategist and the founder to be the same person for the life of the account, rather than a team sized to a tier. The tradeoff is that output follows the forecast, not a capacity ceiling.
"Our commercial pages were losing organic sessions month over month, and the demand coming from AI assistants was effectively invisible in our CRM. RTR pointed the first batch entirely at bottom-funnel pages. One quarter after launch, organic sessions to that page set were up 9x and demo requests attributed to search and AI had grown 2.3x. They also rebuilt how we read attribution, combining what tracking captures with what buyers tell us on the form. That surfaced roughly 12.5x more search and AI demand than our native classifier was crediting. That's the number our leadership team can actually defend."

Where Breaking B2B wins
Breaking B2B is the better fit when you want a fixed-capacity programme with more output per dollar and you are ready to commit for six or twelve months. Gold at $8,000 a month buys 10 content pieces, 6 DA50+ link credits, CRO heatmaps, a live Looker Studio dashboard and bi-weekly calls with a dedicated lead strategist; Aggressive Growth at $15,200 buys 20 pieces and 14 credits with competitor displacement campaigns. It also covers ground we do not: conversion heatmaps, a website support add-on, Reddit and YouTube. Its case studies report VerifyTreatment going from 5 to 32 demos a month and Chattermill's AI mention rate rising from 20 to 80 percent. If your team knows it wants the engine and the year, this is a strong one.
It is also the better fit if you sell B2B services rather than software. Breaking B2B works with logistics, construction, financial services and law firms as well as SaaS; we work with B2B SaaS and tech only.
If what you need is a demo number you can defend before the spend is approved, on a monthly plan you can leave with 30 days' notice, that is the case we are built for.
Recommendation
More comparisons
FAQs
If yours is not here, bring it to the call. Same unpolished answer either way.
Both agencies publish full prices. Breaking B2B runs from Silver at $6,000 a month to Aggressive Growth at $15,200 on a 12-month term ($500 a month more on a 6-month term), with Category King from $20,000 and a narrower Light plan from $4,600; it does not offer terms shorter than six months. Rock the Rankings is $5,000 for Consulting, $8,500 for Done-For-You and $15,000 for Authority a month, with no onboarding fee, on a monthly plan with no minimum term and 30 days' notice. Breaking B2B ships more per dollar in month one; Rock the Rankings carries no term.
At Rock the Rankings, day 90 is the first forecast review: results are measured against the conservative scenario you received before signing and the plan is adjusted from there. You are on a monthly plan throughout, so you can leave in any month with 30 days' notice. At Breaking B2B, day 90 is where quick wins are expected to show if your site already has SEO equity, and month four onward if it does not; the programme itself runs for the six or twelve months you signed, and it makes no results promise.
Both put something in front of you first. Breaking B2B gives you a custom 90-day plan after a call with Sam Dunning, so you see the work before you commit, but publishes no scenario forecast. Rock the Rankings builds three scenarios from your GA4 and CRM data before any agreement is signed, and the conservative scenario is the number we are held to. If you want to see the plan, both will show you. If you want a number attached and someone standing behind it, that is us.
Both start with bottom-funnel pages and run SEO and AI search as one programme. Breaking B2B covers AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, starts with an answer-gap audit, grades AI search by tier from "Included" to "Aggressive", and reserves monthly tracked prompt sets for its higher tiers. Rock the Rankings baselines five engines and tracks prompts on every plan, builds in the GEO Stack order, and scales citations as the forecast proves out. Choose Breaking B2B for more outreach volume at the top tiers; choose us for full coverage and tracking from the entry plan.
At Rock the Rankings, Founder, Justin Berg runs strategy on every engagement with a senior strategist, no account managers, and same-day Slack. At Breaking B2B the first call is with founder Sam Dunning, then a dedicated lead strategist owns the programme with senior SEOs, writers and digital PR behind them, bi-weekly calls, a shared Slack channel and named senior account leadership on every tier. Both say no juniors. The difference is whether the founder stays on delivery.
Usually not as retainers, because the scopes overlap almost completely: both run strategy, content, links, technical and AI search as one programme. The one combination that makes sense is a Breaking B2B Reddit or YouTube programme alongside our organic and AI search work, since we do not run either. If you are choosing between us, pick on terms and commitment, not on service list.