Choose Omnius if you are a SaaS, fintech or AI company, especially in Europe, that wants SEO and GEO run on an agency's own AI search tracking technology, with a prompt-level baseline before work, structured data and technical AEO done on the site, programmatic SEO and Webflow development in scope, from a team that takes on only eight clients a year. Choose Rock the Rankings if your board wants a pipeline number someone will be held to, you want published prices on a monthly plan, your CRM files AI-sourced demos as Direct, and you want the founder on the account.
At a glance
| Criterion | ||
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | drawAI-native SEO and GEO agency for SaaS, fintech and AI companies only. London and Dubai. Owns its tracking tech. | drawAI search as a pipeline channel. B2B SaaS and tech only. 300+ engagements. |
| Forecast and commitment | lose"Maximising growth probability"; results in 2 to 3 months, significant in 6 to 12. Forecast and commitment: Not public. | winThree scenarios before signing. The conservative scenario is the commitment. |
| Attribution method | drawData analytics service; LLM session behaviour and conversion tracking. Attribution method: Not public. | drawThe Two-Witness Rule: CRM source and buyer's answer, every contact tiered. |
| AI search baseline | drawLLM visibility audit and baseline across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude on its own tool, before any page is touched. | drawBaseline across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, AI Overviews before work ships. |
| Proprietary technology, programmatic and development | winAtomic AGI tracking tool; programmatic SEO; Webflow development and CRO; entity SEO; fintech depth. | loseSEO, AI search, content, links, technical. Third-party tracking; no programmatic or development. |
| Who runs the account | loseInternal staff only; 12-week Academy; up to eight clients a year. Founder on delivery: Not public. | winFounder, Justin Berg and a senior strategist. No account managers. |
| Pricing transparency | loseNo prices; customised per project after assessment. Terms: Not public. | winPrices published. Monthly plan, no minimum, 30 days' notice. |
| Link and citation building | drawLLM-source-based backlinking and off-page SEO. Volume and DR: Not public. | drawFrom 5 to 8 placements a month at DR 50+, scaled to the forecast. |
| Content production | drawPages tested against real prompts and NLP-scored; no AI writing by stated policy. Volume: Not public. | drawFrom 5 solution-aware pages a month, scaling to 20 or 30+ with the forecast. |
| Best fit | drawSaaS, fintech and AI companies wanting technical AEO and programmatic growth from a Europe-based team. | drawB2B SaaS and tech wanting a pipeline number before spending, on a monthly plan. |
Comparison methodology
Scored on what Omnius publishes on its own site, checked 14 November 2026. Nothing from sales calls or third parties.
We read Omnius's AI SEO services page, including its four-phase process, technology section, client cards and FAQ, and its services navigation, and scored only what those pages say. Rock the Rankings is scored on its published pricing, process and client results pages. Where Omnius publishes nothing on a criterion, the cell says Not public.
Win, draw and lose describe the Rock the Rankings column only. Win means we commit to more, or publish what Omnius does not. Lose means Omnius offers more. Draw means both agencies meet the criterion in different ways and the right choice depends on your situation.
We re-score every quarter and whenever either agency changes its published services, pricing or terms.
Researched, written and reviewed by


One of the two publishes a full price list. The other prices every project after an assessment.
Omnius publishes no prices. Its FAQ states that pricing is customised to each project's product type, industry, scale and complexity, so an assessment is needed for an accurate quote, and its contact form asks for a website URL before a call. Contract length and notice terms are not published; it does say it onboards up to eight clients a year, about two a quarter, with start dates depending on demand and cultural fit.
Rock the Rankings is $5,000 for Consulting, $8,500 for Done-For-You and $15,000 for Authority a month, with no onboarding fee, on a monthly plan with no minimum term and 30 days' notice. Day 90 is the first forecast review, measured against the conservative scenario you received before signing.
The honest comparison: Omnius is the better pick if you are willing to wait for one of the eight slots a year and want a programme scoped to a fintech or AI product with the regulatory and technical depth that implies. Scarcity is a real signal when the team is internal and trained in-house.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you cannot wait for one of eight slots and want the number and the terms before any assessment. The tradeoff is scope: we start focused and scale as the forecast proves out, and we do not scope programmatic or development in.
"Justin and his team have been phenomenal from Day 0, and the consistency in quality and the measurable results they have delivered have been a true transformation to our business. We are extremely happy and we have already recommended them to our friends."

Omnius frames its work as maximising the probability of growth. We put a number on the growth before the contract.
Omnius describes itself as maximising the probability of being included in AI answers, selected by agents and chosen by humans, and its baseline phase delivers a report ranking your highest-probability queries by citation opportunity and funnel stage with a prioritised AEO roadmap, KPIs and production sequencing; its FAQ sets timing at two to three months for first results and six to twelve for significant ones. It publishes no pre-contract forecast, scenarios or committed number.
Rock the Rankings builds three scenarios (conservative, realistic, optimistic) from your GA4 and CRM data before any agreement is signed, with capture rate as the only input that changes between them. The conservative scenario is the commitment, reviewed at day 90 and quarterly after.
The honest comparison: Omnius is the better pick if you want the plan ranked by citation probability from the agency's own prompt data rather than by a revenue model, and you are comfortable with KPIs set after the baseline instead of a number before the contract.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if a roadmap ranked by citation probability is less useful to the board than a demo number before the invoice. The conservative scenario is that number; it leans on benchmarks only when CRM data is withheld.
Both agencies baseline before work. Omnius does it on tracking technology it built itself.
Omnius's first phase is an LLM visibility audit and baseline across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, tracking which prompts trigger a citation, which competitors get quoted instead, and the gaps, before touching a single page; it then implements structured data and entity relationships, reformats content into Q&A blocks and TL;DRs tested against real prompts and scored with internal NLP tooling, and fixes crawlability for OAI-SearchBot and other AI crawlers.
It built its own AI search tracking tool in early 2024, now Atomic AGI, which tracks citations, mentions and sentiment across the four engines beside Google rankings, and says its AEO protocols come from that data rather than from traditional SEO assumptions.
Rock the Rankings baselines across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode and AI Overviews before work ships, then builds in the GEO Stack order: solution-aware pages first, citations second, problem-aware capture last.
The honest comparison: Omnius is the better pick if you want Claude in the baseline, the tracking owned rather than rented, and the technical layer, schema, entity relationships, crawler access and JavaScript, implemented on the site by the same team. An agency that built its own tool in 2024 has data most have only read about.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you want the baseline tied to a forecast and the technical findings handed to your developers rather than implemented by the agency. We track on third-party tools and start focused, scaling as the forecast proves out.
"I have been impressed with Justin and team's knowledge, work ethic and commitment to improving SEO. I have been in the digital space for nearly 20 years across different verticals and Rock the Rankings is the only SEO agency that I have worked with that has made a meaningful impact to the associated business. If I found myself at another company, needing help with SEO, Justin would be my first call"
Omnius tracks LLM sessions and conversions on its own tool. We reconcile each contact against the buyer's own answer.
Omnius sells data analytics as a service, tracks LLM session behaviour, generative engine sources, prompts and citations on its own tool with reporting, and publishes a SaaS conversion tracking guide; its cases report outcomes in signups and marketing-qualified leads, including a fintech client's signups up 227.9 percent in six months and Global App Testing's high-quality MQLs up 163 percent in twelve. How demos are attributed to AI search when the referrer is stripped, and whether a self-reported source is read beside the CRM, are not published.
Rock the Rankings applies The Two-Witness Rule on every plan: the CRM source and the buyer's own answer are read together and every contact is tiered confirmed, recovered, probable or dark. On one client funnel, 11 CRM-attributed AI leads sat beside 809 self-reported ones, a 73× gap. Where CRM access is restricted, we work from an anonymised export under NDA.
The honest comparison: Omnius is the better pick if you want session-level data on how LLM visitors behave on your site, from a tool the agency controls, with signups and MQLs as the reported outcome. For a product-led fintech or AI company, that is the right lens.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if LLM session data on a dashboard does not answer why the CRM says Direct. We reconcile each contact monthly against the buyer's own answer, by hand.
This is where Omnius covers ground we do not.
Omnius owns Atomic AGI, its AI-native SEO analytics software for tracking AI search visibility, analysing SEO data, auditing websites and automating optimisation tasks, and calls itself one of the very few agencies that owns both the service delivery and the data-processing technology behind AI search optimisation. It sells programmatic SEO, Webflow development and CRO through its Omnius Labs studio, entity SEO, SEO localisation and international SEO, and publishes industry reports and research; its fintech practice accounts for interchange fees, embedded finance, open banking and regulatory compliance.
Rock the Rankings runs SEO, AI search, content, links and technical with third-party tracking tools; we do not run programmatic SEO, development, CRO or localisation.
The honest comparison: Omnius is the better pick if you want the agency to own the data layer and the site build, run programmatic pages at scale, and bring fintech or AI category depth. For a European fintech scaling across markets, that combination is rare.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you want the programme without the platform, the programmatic pages or the Webflow studio, measured against a number. We start focused and scale as the forecast proves out.
"Extremely responsive and analytical. We were impressed with the depth of knowledge brought to every meeting. Justin was great to work with. I highly recommend Rock the Rankings for your GEO/SEO needs."

Omnius caps its intake and trains its own team. It does not publish who leads the account.
Omnius states that it onboards up to eight clients a year, about two a quarter, uses only internal resources, and puts team members through a 12-week Academy; client quotes describe a named person in charge, call the team an extension of the in-house team, and one names founder Mat Golubovic directly. Who leads a given account, the team's seniority, and whether the founder is involved in delivery as standard are not published.
Rock the Rankings is founder-led through delivery: Founder, Justin Berg runs strategy on every engagement alongside a senior strategist with B2B SaaS category experience, with no account managers in between and Slack and email with same-day replies.
The honest comparison: Omnius is the better pick if a hard cap on client count is the proof you want that attention will not be diluted. Eight a year, internal staff only, trained in-house, is a more specific commitment to focus than most agencies make.
Rock the Rankings is the better pick if you want the founder, not a capped roster, as the reason attention will not be diluted. Output scales to the forecast, not to an intake limit.
"Our commercial pages were losing organic sessions month over month, and the demand coming from AI assistants was effectively invisible in our CRM. RTR pointed the first batch entirely at bottom-funnel pages. One quarter after launch, organic sessions to that page set were up 9x and demo requests attributed to search and AI had grown 2.3x. They also rebuilt how we read attribution, combining what tracking captures with what buyers tell us on the form. That surfaced roughly 12.5x more search and AI demand than our native classifier was crediting. That's the number our leadership team can actually defend."

Where Omnius wins
Omnius is the better fit when you want AI search run on an agency's own data. It built its tracking tool in early 2024, now Atomic AGI, and runs every engagement from a prompt-level baseline across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude before touching a page, then does the technical work most agencies skip: structured data and entity relationships, crawler access for OAI-SearchBot, JavaScript and Core Web Vitals, llms.txt, content reformatted into Q&A blocks and tested against real prompts. Around that sit programmatic SEO, Webflow development and CRO, entity SEO and localisation, with dedicated fintech and AI practices. It takes eight clients a year, staffs internally through a 12-week Academy, and its clients include BigCommerce, Payoneer, WorldFirst, Meniga and ANNA Money; its cases report an AI SaaS tool grown from zero to 2.73M organic clicks in thirteen months and a fintech's signups up 227.9 percent in six. If you are a European SaaS, fintech or AI company and want the technical layer owned by the same team, this is the kind of partner to call.
It is also the better fit if you need programmatic pages at scale or a Webflow build inside the engagement.
If what you need is a demo number someone will be held to before any invoice, with the prices on the site and the founder on the account, that is the case we are built for.
Recommendation
More comparisons
FAQs
If yours is not here, bring it to the call. Same unpolished answer either way.
Rock the Rankings publishes its prices: $5,000 for Consulting, $8,500 for Done-For-You and $15,000 for Authority a month, with no onboarding fee, on a monthly plan with no minimum term and 30 days' notice. Omnius publishes no prices; its FAQ says pricing is customised to each project and an assessment is needed for a quote, and it takes on about two new clients a quarter. If you need the number before the call, that is one of the two.
At Rock the Rankings, day 90 is the first forecast review: results are measured against the conservative scenario you received before signing and the plan is adjusted from there, and you can leave in any month with 30 days' notice. Omnius sets expectations of first results in two to three months and significant results in six to twelve; its contract length, notice period and review cadence are not published.
Omnius delivers a baseline report after signing that ranks your highest-probability queries by citation opportunity and funnel stage, with a roadmap and KPIs; it publishes no pre-contract forecast or committed number. Rock the Rankings builds three scenarios from your GA4 and CRM data before any agreement is signed, and the conservative scenario is the number we are held to. If a probability-ranked roadmap from the agency's own prompt data is what you want, Omnius does that. If you want a number someone stands behind, that is us.
Both baseline before work. Omnius runs a prompt-level LLM visibility audit across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude on its own tracking tool, implements structured data, entity relationships and crawler access on the site, and tests content against real prompts; its AI SaaS case reports zero to 2.73M organic clicks in thirteen months. Rock the Rankings baselines ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode and AI Overviews before any page ships and builds in the GEO Stack order from your own pages outward, held to a forecast. Choose Omnius for owned tooling and on-site technical AEO; choose us for a baseline tied to a committed number.
At Rock the Rankings, Founder, Justin Berg runs strategy on every engagement with a senior strategist, no account managers, and same-day Slack. Omnius uses internal staff only, trains them through a 12-week Academy, and caps intake at eight clients a year; who leads a given account and whether the founder is involved in delivery are not published, though a client quote names a person in charge and another names the founder.
In one shape: Omnius's Webflow development, CRO or programmatic SEO beside our solution-aware pages, citations and forecast, since we run none of those. Both running SEO and GEO would overlap, because both start with a baseline of the same engines. If you are choosing between us for the core programme, pick on the forecast, the published terms, and whether you want the tracking and the technical layer owned by the agency.